PhD in Private Law Faculty of Law and Political Sciences University of Tehran
Abstract
Although the procedural law and formalities governing monetary obligations are not an isolated enclave apart from the general rules of adjudication, the distinctive features of such obligations, often arising in contracts between merchants or ordinary persons acting for commercial purposes, have at times warranted separate inquiry. The central question pursued in this article, therefore, is what specific procedural rules govern monetary obligations. It appears that, by virtue of their particular nature, monetary obligations in certain respects attract specialized rules that merit close scrutiny. Accordingly, employing an analytical–descriptive method and drawing on library sources, the study examines these rules from the very inception of proceeding, namely, the preparation and filing of the statement of claim—through to the enforcement of the judgment. The article is thus organized into six sections, addressing in turn: (1) the designation of the relief sought, (2) the valuation of the claim, (3) jurisdiction and court fees, (4) defenses, (5) the rendering of judgment, and (6) its enforcement.
Arabasadi,T. and Ghaffari,A. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Procedural Judicial Rules on Monetary Claims. (e731638). Comparative Civil Procedure, 1(2), e731638
MLA
Arabasadi,T. , and Ghaffari,A. . "Comparative Analysis of Procedural Judicial Rules on Monetary Claims" .e731638 , Comparative Civil Procedure, 1, 2, 2026, e731638.
HARVARD
Arabasadi T., Ghaffari A. (2026). 'Comparative Analysis of Procedural Judicial Rules on Monetary Claims', Comparative Civil Procedure, 1(2), e731638.
CHICAGO
T. Arabasadi and A. Ghaffari, "Comparative Analysis of Procedural Judicial Rules on Monetary Claims," Comparative Civil Procedure, 1 2 (2026): e731638,
VANCOUVER
Arabasadi T., Ghaffari A. Comparative Analysis of Procedural Judicial Rules on Monetary Claims. Comparative Civil Procedure, 2026; 1(2): e731638.