Procedure & Regularity for Accuracy, True Dispute Resolution and Happiness

Lessons from the Analysis of Three Judgments of the Third Branch of the Supreme Court of Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Author

assistance professor of private law department, faculty of law and political science,, university of Kharazmi, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
This article evaluates three judgments issued by one of the branches of the Supreme Court (the Third Branch of the Supreme Court). Using a descriptive-analytical method, and while briefly presenting the judgments issued in these cases, it demonstrates that the judges of the Court, in the rulings in question, paid particular attention to the details of the case, attached considerable value to the procedural rights of the parties, and guided the courts of first instance on important points. The judgment issued is eloquent in its drafting, and while attending to the important issue of jurisdiction, it also points out significant matters concerning procedural objections; moreover, it addresses oversight of the manner in which a document is characterized and interpreted. On an important issue such as the characterization of a document, it reached conclusions that had not been contemplated by the lower courts. Furthermore, the analysis of the effect of a criminal judgment on a legal issue was another notable feature of one of the judgments issued, and the judges highlighted an active role for the judge in the possibility of examining evidentiary proof.

Keywords

Subjects

Volume 2, Special Number
Commemorative Volume Honoring His Excellency The Judge Hassan Ghaffarpour Maraghi President of 3rd Branch of the Supreme Court, Iran
2026

  • Receive Date 15 September 2026
  • Revise Date 26 September 2026
  • Accept Date 26 September 2026
  • Publish Date 23 October 2026