Procedure & Regularity for Accuracy, True Dispute Resolution and Happiness

During the Proceedings” in Incidental Third-Party Objection: A Temporal Condition or a Procedural Characteristic (A Review of Judgment No. 95099700909100156, Dated May 14, 2016, Issued by Branch 3 of the Supreme Court)

Document Type : Original Article

Author

PhD Candidate in Private Law University of Tehran Kish Campus

Abstract
Incidental third-party objection is a procedural mechanism through which a party to a pending lawsuit challenges a previous judgment that has been invoked by the opposing party in support of its claim. Article 419(b) of the Iranian Civil Procedure Code defines an incidental objection as an objection by one of the parties to a judgment previously rendered by a court and produced by the opposing party “during the proceedings” in order to prove its claim. The judgment under consideration raises an important question as to whether the phrase “during the proceedings” constitutes a strict temporal requirement, meaning that the previous judgment must be introduced only after the commencement of the proceedings and during a subsequent procedural stage, or whether it primarily refers to the procedural context in which the previous judgment becomes relevant and thus reflects the incidental nature of the objection. This question becomes particularly significant where the previous judgment is relied upon from the very beginning of the action, including in the statement of claim.

Keywords

Subjects

Volume 2, Special Number
Commemorative Volume Honoring His Excellency The Judge Hassan Ghaffarpour Maraghi President of 3rd Branch of the Supreme Court, Iran
2026

  • Receive Date 20 September 2026
  • Revise Date 28 September 2026
  • Accept Date 29 September 2026
  • Publish Date 23 October 2026