Procedure & Regularity for Accuracy, True Dispute Resolution and Happiness

Claim for Deficiency in Area (A Critical Analysis of Supreme Court Judgment No. 9409970909100561, dated 17 February 2016, rendered by Branch Three of the Supreme Court of Iran)

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Bachelor degree in Law, University of Imam Khomeini, Qazvin, Iran Attorney at Law

Abstract
Articles 384 and 355 of the Iranian Civil Code address, respectively, the two situations in which the subject matter of a sale is divisible and indivisible. Although Article 485 expressly refers to a house, it appears that, pursuant to Article 10 of the Apartment Ownership Act, the legal treatment of an apartment differs from that of a house. The basis for this distinction, in addition to the aforementioned provision, lies in the customary practice governing apartment transactions, under which the floor area is ordinarily set against the purchase price. This is particularly significant where the sale is concluded before the exact floor area has been determined on the basis of the condominium subdivision plan (soorat-majles-e tafkiki) and the official cadastral plans, and a discrepancy in area is subsequently discovered upon delivery of the property and execution of the official deed.
In such circumstances, a party who has paid a higher price but received a smaller area, or who has sold a larger area than that ultimately delivered, should be entitled to claim the difference without having a right of rescission under Article 355 of the Civil Code.

Keywords

Subjects

Volume 2, Special Number
Commemorative Volume Honoring His Excellency The Judge Hassan Ghaffarpour Maraghi President of 3rd Branch of the Supreme Court, Iran
2026

  • Receive Date 01 October 2026
  • Accept Date 04 October 2026
  • Publish Date 23 October 2026