نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانش آموخته دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
A judgment can have the potential for multiple objections at the simultaneously. This assumption will pose challenges in dispute where the parties are multiple and indivisible. After the judgment of the inferiorcourt, some of the losing parties may file an appeal within the specified deadline, while others may choose the appealing to the supreme court after the appeal deadline has expired or by waiving their right to appeal. The Apply of both rights of objection changes changes the authority and has led to the existence of various judgments, the result of which we see in the Unification of Judgments Decision of Supreme Court No.855. Some branches hold that there should be a deal in both the appellate court and the Supreme Court, considering that the right to appeal is regarded as one of the fundamental rights and the other hand, some branches, relying on the extension of the judgment based on Articles 359, 367, and 404 of the Civil Procedure Code, consider that the mere filing of an appeal by some parties to the dispute and the issuance of a judgment by the appellate court prevents the review of the request for appealing to the supreme court.
کلیدواژهها English