نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد آیین دادرسی مدنی و بازرگانی، گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، عضو هسته پژوهشی عدالت و آیین دادرسی مدنی دانشگاه تهران عضو انجمن بین المللی حقوق دادرسی تهران، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه تهران پردیس البرز
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Access to justice should always be possible. However, in a state of emergency during war, the way to access justice is challenging because, on the one hand, the lives of the actors in the proceedings are at stake, and on the other hand, access to justice cannot be interrupted. In some cases, the use of electronic proceedings can meet both goals and be a suitable solution for continuing the proceedings in this state of emergency. This article examines the feasibility of electronic civil proceedings in times of war using a descriptive-analytical method and library resources. The research findings show that while in French law, due to the optional nature of electronic proceedings, in an emergency situation such as war, suspending the proceedings until some time after the end of the emergency period is the executive solution in that country, in Iranian law, due to the mandatory nature of the electronic civil proceedings, the proceedings can be continued in some cases and with a combination of circumstances, and help realize the principle of continuity of justice in exceptional circumstances.
کلیدواژهها English