به آیینی و به سامانی:
درستی - سازش - شادی
نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
Evaluating the scope of the clause waiving the option of lesional loss (khiyār al-ghabn) and its applicability to extreme degrees of disparity constitutes one of the fundamental challenges in contract law. This article critically examines Judgment No. 9409970906900587 rendered by the 3rd Branch of the Supreme Court, in which a waiver of the option of lesional loss "to any extent" was construed as depriving the aggrieved party of the right of rescission, even in the presence of a gross price disparity (double the actual market value). Through a jurisprudential and legal analysis of the issue—focusing on the parties’ constructive intent and customary limitation (inṣirāf), which has also been affirmed by Unified Judicial Precedent No. 821 of the General Bench of the Supreme Court—this study concludes that a waiver clause covers only customary and intended degrees of loss, without extending to extreme disparities or multi-fold price differences. Nevertheless, the judgment itself remains justifiable solely on the basis of the aggrieved party's explicit admission of full awareness regarding market practice.
کلیدواژهها English
