نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
استاد آیین دادرسی مدنی و بازرگانی گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
The Civil and Criminal Procedure Codes contain no provision governing the procedure for referring a case to the General Assembly of the Supreme Court of Iran following a second appeal on points of law. It remains unclear what is meant by the term “opinion” (nazar) in Article 408 of the Civil Procedure Code, what form such an opinion should take, and for what purpose and in what manner it should be drafted.
As can be inferred from the significant judgment rendered by Branch Three of the Supreme Court of Iran, such an opinion takes the form of a judicial decision, specifically an order referring the case to the General Assembly for adjudication. This decision is final and, being embodied in a judgment, is also served on the parties. The case is then transmitted to the Supreme Court’s Office of Jurisprudential Unification so that it may be brought before the General Assembly.
In this capacity, the General Assembly acts as an adjudicator between the Supreme Court Chamber and the lower court, although, under certain circumstances, it may refer the case back to the Chamber.
کلیدواژهها English