به آیینی و به سامانی:
درستی - سازش - شادی
نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
قاضی دادگستری مستشار دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان البرز، کرج، ایران دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه تهران، پردیس بین المللی کیش
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
The adjudication of claims concerning legal incapacity is considered a matter of non-contentious jurisdiction. Although no dispute arises in the strict sense or in an adversarial form in such matters, courts observe, to the extent appropriate, the principles and procedural rules governing the adjudication of disputes. The principal subject of this article is third-party opposition to a judgment declaring a person legally incapacitated. A person adversely affected by the declaration of another person’s incapacity challenged the court’s judgment as a third party, thereby raising the issue of the effects and consequences of a judgment of incapacity on persons who had not participated in the proceedings leading to its issuance. The case indirectly examines the principal elements of third-party opposition and analyzes a significant judicial decision in this regard from both procedural and substantive perspectives. The judgment clarifies the principal elements and requirements of third-party opposition to a judgment of incapacity and is therefore significant in defining the scope and conditions for exercising this remedy against judicial decisions. Its examination also contributes to understanding the role of third-party opposition in non-contentious proceedings and the protection of third parties’ rights.
کلیدواژهها English
