به آیینی و به سامانی:
درستی - سازش - شادی
نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
The multiplicity and differences in the nature of the grounds for quashing a trial court judgment constitute one of the most complex issues in cassation procedure. In addition to the importance of correctly determining the “nature” of a ground for quashing and matching it with the grounds set forth in Article 371, this issue also raises the question of which court has jurisdiction where the Supreme Court quashes a judgment on two different grounds the case must be referred to a court of coordinate jurisdiction. despite the judgment’s strength in identifying instances of incomplete investigation, it suffers from a serious defect in determining the “nature of the grounds for quashing” and in invoking the relevant paragraphs of Article 371 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Furthermore, observance of the principles of fair trial, objective impartiality, the principle of jurisdiction of a court of coordinate jurisdiction, the exceptional nature of the jurisdiction of the court that rendered the quashed judgment in cassation proceedings, and the need to maintain public confidence in impartial adjudication require that, where multiple grounds for quashing exist in cassation proceedings, jurisdiction should lie with a lower court of coordinate jurisdiction.
کلیدواژهها English
