به آیینی و به سامانی:
درستی - سازش - شادی
نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
حقوق عمومی، حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Humans use heuristics unconsciously, i.e., cognitive processes or experience-based strategies that are used to solve a problem or reach a decision, leading to cognitive biases. Judges are human and prone to the same cognitive biases, especially since the nature of their job requires judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and cognitive biases are unconscious and occur automatically.
This article uses data from behavioral science studies and desk research to address the question of which heuristics are used in the judicial process, what biases they lead to, and how they can be moderated. Confirmation bias, hindsight bias, availability bias, representation bias, and moral bias are among the most prominent ones. There are ways to minimize harmful biases in judgment. Training and publication of judicial opinions, utilizing checklists, reassessment (by judges themselves or a higher court), and writing judicial opinions are existing solutions, some of which are reflected in procedural law and should be taken seriously. It should also bear in mind that the fallibility of the mind requires a review of the irreversible legal consequences in the judicial justice system.
کلیدواژهها English
