Procedure & Regularity for Accuracy, True Dispute Resolution and Happiness
New Evidence in Cassation Proceedings (Review and Critique of Judgment No. 9609970909100038 Dated April 19, 2017, Issued by Branch 3 of the Supreme Court)
Professor of Civil & Commercial Law, Private &. Islamic Law Department, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences University of Tehran
Abstract
In cassation proceedings, new evidence cannot be introduced, as the appeal in cassation lacks devolutive effect; the Supreme Court confines its review of the judgment's validity to the evidence already present in the case file. However, this rule does not preclude a finding that the lower court's investigation was incomplete; the Supreme Court may overturn the judgment on grounds of procedural deficiency and remand the case to the lower court with instructions to conduct the necessary proceedings and inquiries.
In the present case, an appeal in cassation was lodged three times. On each occasion, the Supreme Court deemed the lower court's proceedings and investigation incomplete. Upon the third appeal, the original document—the absence of which had consistently rendered the initial court's proceedings defective—was located. The Supreme Court received and examined the original document, then overturned the judgment and remitted the matter to the issuing court for further proceedings and evaluation of said document. The ruling by the Third Branch of the Supreme Court—regarding adherence to the aforementioned principle, as well as the review and identification of deficiencies in the investigation—stands as one of the finest and most precise rulings within the judicial system.
Mohseni, H. (2026). New Evidence in Cassation Proceedings (Review and Critique of Judgment No. 9609970909100038 Dated April 19, 2017, Issued by Branch 3 of the Supreme Court). (e741930). Comparative Civil Procedure, 2(Special Number), e741930
MLA
Mohseni, H. "New Evidence in Cassation Proceedings (Review and Critique of Judgment No. 9609970909100038 Dated April 19, 2017, Issued by Branch 3 of the Supreme Court)" .e741930 , Comparative Civil Procedure, 2, Special Number, 2026, e741930.
HARVARD
Mohseni H. (2026). 'New Evidence in Cassation Proceedings (Review and Critique of Judgment No. 9609970909100038 Dated April 19, 2017, Issued by Branch 3 of the Supreme Court)', Comparative Civil Procedure, 2(Special Number), e741930.
CHICAGO
H. Mohseni, "New Evidence in Cassation Proceedings (Review and Critique of Judgment No. 9609970909100038 Dated April 19, 2017, Issued by Branch 3 of the Supreme Court)," Comparative Civil Procedure, 2 Special Number (2026): e741930,
VANCOUVER
Mohseni H. New Evidence in Cassation Proceedings (Review and Critique of Judgment No. 9609970909100038 Dated April 19, 2017, Issued by Branch 3 of the Supreme Court). Comparative Civil Procedure. 2026;2(Special Number):e741930 (In Persian).